Problem 10

Explanation

Let's translate the statements into mathematical logic.

Let:

• $p$: Nakafa students work on conditional empathy questions.
• $q$: Nakafa students can work on TOBK questions on the Nakafa app.
• $r$: Nakafa students get Learning Achievement Evaluation (EPB) results.

The given statements are:

1. If Nakafa students work on conditional empathy questions, then they can work on TOBK questions on the Nakafa app ($p \rightarrow q$).
2. If Nakafa students work on TOBK questions on the Nakafa app, then they get Learning Achievement Evaluation (EPB) results ($q \rightarrow r$).
3. Fact: Dito works on TOBK questions on the Nakafa app ($q$).

We have the premise $q \rightarrow r$ and the fact $q$. Based on the Modus Ponens rule of inference:

Therefore, the conclusion is $r$, which is Dito gets Learning Achievement Evaluation (EPB) results.

Note that the first premise ($p \rightarrow q$) is not directly used to draw this conclusion because the fact we have is $q$, not $p$. Even though $q$ occurs, we cannot conclude $p$ (affirming the consequent is a fallacy). The main focus is the implication from $q$ to $r$.