Question 16

Explanation

Based on the text, there is a clear cause-and-effect relationship regarding the impact of IKN construction on animals:

IKN Construction $\rightarrow$ Human-animal conflict $\rightarrow$ Threatens habitat $\rightarrow$ Some animals threatened with extinction.

This sequence of events demonstrates that the construction of IKN has a real impact on the existence and survival of animals in the region.

Therefore, the statement "The construction of the National Capital City (IKN) does not affect the existence of animals" is DEFINITELY FALSE because it explicitly contradicts the fact that the construction triggers conflicts and extinction threats.

Analysis of Other Options:

• Minimizing habitat destruction can reduce extinction threats: True. This is the solution proposed at the end of the text.
• Some plant species are threatened with extinction: Inconclusive. The text mentions "hundreds of plant species" exist there, but specifically states that "a number of animals" are threatened.
• Some animals are threatened due to habitat destruction: True. Conflicts threaten habitats, leading to extinction threats.
• Habitat destruction affects construction: False. The text's logic is that construction affects habitats, not the other way around.