Question 7

Explanation

We can analyze the text using a chain of syllogisms (cause-and-effect logic). Let's break down the premises found in the text:

Identifying Premises

Based on the text, we can construct the logical flow as follows:

• Premise 1 ($P \rightarrow Q$): Consuming high-fat food ($P$) causes excess calories ($Q$).
• Premise 2 ($Q \rightarrow R$): Excess calories ($Q$) cause weight gain ($R$).
• Premise 3 ($R \rightarrow S$): Weight gain ($R$) makes the body difficult to move actively ($S$).

Drawing a Conclusion

Using the rule of hypothetical syllogism (chain reasoning), we can connect the initial premises directly to the final conclusion. If we connect Premise 2 and Premise 3:

This means: "Excess calories (Q) result in the body being difficult to move actively (S)."

Analyzing Statements

Let's evaluate each statement based on the logical conclusion above:

• Increase energy during the day: Incorrect. The text explicitly states that high-fat foods cause lethargy, which is the opposite of increased energy.
• Good impact on body health: Incorrect. The text does not mention any positive impact; instead, the narrative focuses on negative effects like lethargy and difficulty moving.
• Lethargy is always caused by high-fat foods: Incorrect. The word "always" is a generalization unsupported by the text. The text only states "can cause," not that it is the sole cause.
• Consuming enough fatty foods: Incorrect. The premises focus on consuming high or excess fat, not enough or sufficient fat.

The statement that excess calories due to fat can result in the body being difficult to move actively is the most accurate because it aligns with the logical flow $Q \rightarrow S$ derived above.

It is important to distinguish between "some" (can cause) and "all" (always causes) when drawing logical conclusions.