Question 7

Explanation

This question asks us to find the conclusion that is most incorrect, which in mathematical logic is equivalent to finding the negation of the implication found in the text.

The main statement in the text is:

"A number of articles in the RKUHP are lighter than the Corruption Law, so it will make corruption in Indonesia more rampant."

We can model this statement as an implication $p \rightarrow q$:

• $p$: A number of articles in the RKUHP are lighter than the Corruption Law.
• $q$: Corruption in Indonesia is becoming more rampant.

The negation of the implication $p \rightarrow q$ is $p \land \sim q$ (p and not q).

Therefore, the conclusion that is most incorrect is: "A number of articles in the RKUHP are lighter than the Corruption Law and corruption in Indonesia is not becoming more rampant (decreasing)."

This statement corresponds to the option stating: "Some articles of the RKUHP are lighter than the Corruption Law and corruption in Indonesia is decreasing."