Question 11

Explanation

Let's translate the statements into mathematical logic.

Let:

• $p$: Nakafa students work on conditional empathy questions.
• $q$: Nakafa students can work on TOBK questions in the Nakafa application.
• $r$: Nakafa students get Learning Achievement Evaluation (EPB) results.

The given statements are:

1. If Nakafa students work on conditional empathy questions, then they can work on TOBK questions in the Nakafa application ($p \rightarrow q$).
2. If Nakafa students work on TOBK questions in the Nakafa application, then they get Learning Achievement Evaluation (EPB) results ($q \rightarrow r$).
3. Dito does not get Learning Achievement Evaluation (EPB) results ($\sim r$).

From premises 1 and 2, we can use syllogism:

Next, we use that conclusion ($p \rightarrow r$) with premise 3 ($\sim r$) using the Modus Tollens rule:

The conclusion is $\sim p$, which means Dito does not work on conditional empathy questions.